When I first read an article about a new library to do String manipulation, I wondered what could be so interesting in there ? Isn't such a basic topic already well addressed in the standard library ?
But since I am a bit concerned in API design and really wanted to know what would justify to create a new library, because the class String looks OK to me, so ... I gave it a look.
No regrets. Indeed the API is clean, consistent and simple to use.
The guava library.
I wouldn't care for trivial String manipulation, but if I have anything just a bit less than trivial, I will definitively use it !
More importantly, I know I have to look more and more to these "praised" project : google collections being next
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rencontres de Calenzana 2025
Mention particulière pour: Gabriel Pidoux (hautbois) Joë Christophe (clarinette) Eva-Nina Kozmus (flûte) Yume Fujise (alto) Noé Natorp (vi...
-
I know I should read all those methods more in details. I found this in the Poll Best Requirement Survey by Xebia. So what is a requirement...
-
Trying to see if I can manage to complete a few projects this year. First I have goals listed in different places: Online Google tasks Roam ...
-
Where it is going ?? Various organisation are working on the problem and its solutions. They produce specification draft, Use case studies, ...
No comments:
Post a Comment